SEGH Articles

Journey from PhD student to employment: difficult but rewarding

21 April 2011
Dr Mark Button has a few words of comfort for students nearing the job market and searching for their future employment

Mark finished his PhD as the worldwide recession began to bite and found it a daunting prospect to find employment at the time.  His experience may be of use to other students in the current economic climate facing the uncertainties of future employment that come in good economic times, let alone recessionary times.  Mark provides a few comments about his journey from stressed PhD student to the workplace, some of which may be of comfort or strike a poignant note with others embarking on a similar journey.

Dr Mark Button completed his PhD in the summer of 2009 entitled ‘Arsenic contaminated soils: human exposure and environmental toxicology' with Leicester University and the British Geological Survey. He employed lab techniques to investigate means of assessing exposure to arsenic from contaminated soils using: earthworms, bioaccessibility testing and toenails for biomonitoring.  Besides the learning of a range of complex lab techniques, he required multidisciplinary skills relevant to many SEGH members, including: GIS, field, statistical and interpersonal skills. 

Mark now works for the Environmental Sciences Group at the Royal Military College in Kingston Ontario, Canada undertaking research on the biotransformation and toxicity of arsenic in the environment with the aim of better understanding how some organisms such as earthworms can be resistant to the harmful effects of arsenic.

What were your fears, hopes, and the reality at the end of your PhD? 

The first challenge was to find positions that matched with the unique set of skills I acquired during my PhD. I wasn't entirely sure what would be the best direction to head in, postdoc, industry, government, or just taking it easy for a while. I hoped something would become clear and it did. I applied for lots of positions that in honesty I did not really want because I felt like I had to be applying. The breakthrough came when I thought more about what I really did want. I contacted the people directly and found myself with possibilities in Austria and Canada.  What boosted my confidence, was that they had seen my publications and were interested in exploring my lines of research.  I would definitely recommend PhD students publishing their work during their PhD on this experience.

How did a PhD benefit you?

As I went into a postdoc research position, my PhD was vital to the work. It felt very strange going from being a student straight into a position where people automatically assumed I was an expert. Having a PhD seems to change the way people see you in the work place. I found it was very important not to let this go to my head.

What did you enjoy about the PhD?

The whole process provided so many opportunities to test and push myself, it was never boring, always challenging and sometimes inspiring. I enjoyed meeting and talking to all kinds of interesting people. My project was multidisciplinary so I found myself learning about analytical chemistry, toxicology, epidemiology, risk assessment; it was exactly the sort of learning I wanted to experience. Then seeing the final creation complete as publications in the scientific literature was a very nice feeling, like I had made a small but worthwhile contribution to our scientific understanding.

What was difficult about the PhD?

I found the level of autonomy difficult at times, keeping a clear direction in mind of what needed to be done, what I wanted to do, what I wanted to avoid doing and how it would all come together required patience and the realization that I needed help from others. Trying not question whether I had done the right thing when the going got tough was a challenge.  It was easy to find reasons to feel anxious and more difficult to stay positive and focused on the many good aspects when the going got tough.

What have you learnt about yourself since?

I learnt that it helps to avoid preconceptions about what experiences will be like, instead of clinging to an idea of how something will be then struggling when it turns out to be different.  It is much more enjoyable to go into things open minded, do your best and go with the flow. I learnt that the biggest limitations are the ones we impose on ourselves by feeling that we will not achieve something. Finishing a PhD has helped me believe that I can achieve things that at first seem too difficult.

What would you liked to have known coming to the end of your PhD that you know now? 

I would like to have known that it was not so serious. At times the pressure felt intense and it was easy to feel isolated. In reality, I was one of many going through the same process and there were always people willing to help in whatever way they could, be they supervisors, fellow students, friends or family. You just need to stay calm and ask for the help you really need.

Tell us something about your overseas experience?

Coming to Canada has been a fantastic opportunity to continue my personal development. Not just academically but in every sense. Again I find myself challenged and engaged in interesting experiences as I did during my PhD. I love the postdoc lifestyle, no thesis to write just the research I am interested in. I have been fortunate to work with Prof Ken Reimer who is very well established in my area of research. I have visited synchrotrons in Chicago and Saskatoon, and been the team leader for fieldwork in Nova Scotia. I have established new techniques in our lab (Comet Assay) and met many more kind and interesting people.

What are some of your hopes for the future?

I try not to think too much about the future, just to know that as long as I am doing my best right now the future will take care of itself. I am open to whatever oportunities present themselves. Environmental research is a vast field so there will always be lots of interesting work to be done.  I enjoy what I am doing and will stick with it as long as I feel enthusiastic and inspired.


The photograph shoes Mark riding around the 1 km storage ring at the Advanced Photon Source in Chicago.  The experimental hall is so big that tricycles are regularly used by staff to move around the site.

Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Spatial variability and geochemistry of rare earth elements in soils from the largest uranium–phosphate deposit of Brazil 2018-02-22


    The Itataia uranium–phosphate deposit is the largest uranium reserve in Brazil. Rare earth elements (REEs) are commonly associated with phosphate deposits; however, there are no studies on the concentrations of REEs in soils of the Itataia deposit region. Thus, the objective of the research was to evaluate the concentration and spatial variability of REEs in topsoils of Itataia phosphate deposit region. In addition, the influence of soil properties on the geochemistry of REEs was investigated. Results showed that relatively high mean concentrations (mg kg−1) of heavy REEs (Gd 6.01; Tb 1.25; Ho 1.15; Er 4.05; Tm 0.64; Yb 4.61; Lu 0.65) were found in surface soils samples. Soil properties showed weak influence on the geochemical behavior of REEs in soils, except for the clay content. On the other hand, parent material characteristics, such as P and U, had strong influence on REEs concentrations. Spatial distribution patterns of REEs in soils are clearly associated with P and U contents. Therefore, geochemical surveys aiming at the delineation of ore-bearing zones in the region can benefit from our data. The results of this work reinforce the perspective for co-mining of P, U and REEs in this important P–U reserve.

  • 2017 Outstanding Reviewers 2018-02-21
  • Seasonal occurrence, source evaluation and ecological risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in industrial and agricultural effluents discharged in Wadi El Bey (Tunisia) 2018-02-13


    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are of great concern due to their persistence, bioaccumulation and toxic properties. The occurrence, source and ecological risk assessment of 26 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in industrial and agricultural effluents affecting the Wadi El Bey watershed were investigated by means of gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis (GC/MS). Total PAHs (∑ 26 PAH) ranged from 1.21 to 91.7 µg/L. The 4- and 5-ring compounds were the principal PAHs detected in most of 5 sites examined. Diagnostic concentration ratios and molecular indices were performed to identify the PAH sources. Results show that PAHs could originate from petrogenic, pyrolytic and mixed sources. According to the ecotoxicological assessment, the potential risk associated with PAHs affecting agricultural and industrial effluents ranged from moderate to high for both aquatic ecosystem and human health. The toxic equivalency factor (TEF) approach indicated that benzo[a]pyrene and benz[a]anthracene were the principal responsible for carcinogenic power of samples.