SEGH Articles

Journey from PhD student to employment: difficult but rewarding

21 April 2011
Dr Mark Button has a few words of comfort for students nearing the job market and searching for their future employment

Mark finished his PhD as the worldwide recession began to bite and found it a daunting prospect to find employment at the time.  His experience may be of use to other students in the current economic climate facing the uncertainties of future employment that come in good economic times, let alone recessionary times.  Mark provides a few comments about his journey from stressed PhD student to the workplace, some of which may be of comfort or strike a poignant note with others embarking on a similar journey.

Dr Mark Button completed his PhD in the summer of 2009 entitled ‘Arsenic contaminated soils: human exposure and environmental toxicology' with Leicester University and the British Geological Survey. He employed lab techniques to investigate means of assessing exposure to arsenic from contaminated soils using: earthworms, bioaccessibility testing and toenails for biomonitoring.  Besides the learning of a range of complex lab techniques, he required multidisciplinary skills relevant to many SEGH members, including: GIS, field, statistical and interpersonal skills. 

Mark now works for the Environmental Sciences Group at the Royal Military College in Kingston Ontario, Canada undertaking research on the biotransformation and toxicity of arsenic in the environment with the aim of better understanding how some organisms such as earthworms can be resistant to the harmful effects of arsenic.

What were your fears, hopes, and the reality at the end of your PhD? 

The first challenge was to find positions that matched with the unique set of skills I acquired during my PhD. I wasn't entirely sure what would be the best direction to head in, postdoc, industry, government, or just taking it easy for a while. I hoped something would become clear and it did. I applied for lots of positions that in honesty I did not really want because I felt like I had to be applying. The breakthrough came when I thought more about what I really did want. I contacted the people directly and found myself with possibilities in Austria and Canada.  What boosted my confidence, was that they had seen my publications and were interested in exploring my lines of research.  I would definitely recommend PhD students publishing their work during their PhD on this experience.

How did a PhD benefit you?

As I went into a postdoc research position, my PhD was vital to the work. It felt very strange going from being a student straight into a position where people automatically assumed I was an expert. Having a PhD seems to change the way people see you in the work place. I found it was very important not to let this go to my head.

What did you enjoy about the PhD?

The whole process provided so many opportunities to test and push myself, it was never boring, always challenging and sometimes inspiring. I enjoyed meeting and talking to all kinds of interesting people. My project was multidisciplinary so I found myself learning about analytical chemistry, toxicology, epidemiology, risk assessment; it was exactly the sort of learning I wanted to experience. Then seeing the final creation complete as publications in the scientific literature was a very nice feeling, like I had made a small but worthwhile contribution to our scientific understanding.

What was difficult about the PhD?

I found the level of autonomy difficult at times, keeping a clear direction in mind of what needed to be done, what I wanted to do, what I wanted to avoid doing and how it would all come together required patience and the realization that I needed help from others. Trying not question whether I had done the right thing when the going got tough was a challenge.  It was easy to find reasons to feel anxious and more difficult to stay positive and focused on the many good aspects when the going got tough.

What have you learnt about yourself since?

I learnt that it helps to avoid preconceptions about what experiences will be like, instead of clinging to an idea of how something will be then struggling when it turns out to be different.  It is much more enjoyable to go into things open minded, do your best and go with the flow. I learnt that the biggest limitations are the ones we impose on ourselves by feeling that we will not achieve something. Finishing a PhD has helped me believe that I can achieve things that at first seem too difficult.

What would you liked to have known coming to the end of your PhD that you know now? 

I would like to have known that it was not so serious. At times the pressure felt intense and it was easy to feel isolated. In reality, I was one of many going through the same process and there were always people willing to help in whatever way they could, be they supervisors, fellow students, friends or family. You just need to stay calm and ask for the help you really need.

Tell us something about your overseas experience?

Coming to Canada has been a fantastic opportunity to continue my personal development. Not just academically but in every sense. Again I find myself challenged and engaged in interesting experiences as I did during my PhD. I love the postdoc lifestyle, no thesis to write just the research I am interested in. I have been fortunate to work with Prof Ken Reimer who is very well established in my area of research. I have visited synchrotrons in Chicago and Saskatoon, and been the team leader for fieldwork in Nova Scotia. I have established new techniques in our lab (Comet Assay) and met many more kind and interesting people.

What are some of your hopes for the future?

I try not to think too much about the future, just to know that as long as I am doing my best right now the future will take care of itself. I am open to whatever oportunities present themselves. Environmental research is a vast field so there will always be lots of interesting work to be done.  I enjoy what I am doing and will stick with it as long as I feel enthusiastic and inspired.


The photograph shoes Mark riding around the 1 km storage ring at the Advanced Photon Source in Chicago.  The experimental hall is so big that tricycles are regularly used by staff to move around the site.

Keep up to date

SEGH Events

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Biochar-based constructed wetlands to treat reverse osmosis rejected concentrates in chronic kidney disease endemic areas in Sri Lanka 2017-12-01


    The objectives were to investigate the potential remedial measures for reverse osmosis (RO) rejected water through constructed wetlands (CWs) with low-cost materials in the media established in chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology (CKDu) prevalent area in Sri Lanka. A pilot-scale surface and subsurface water CWs were established at the Medawachchiya community-based RO water supply unit. Locally available soil, calicut tile and biochar were used in proportions of 81, 16.5 and 2.5% (w/w), respectively, as filter materials in the subsurface. Vetiver grass and Scirpus grossus were selected for subsurface wetland while water lettuce and water hyacinth were chosen for free water surface CWs. Results showed that the CKDu sensitive parameters; total dissolved solids, hardness, total alkalinity and fluoride were reduced considerably (20–85%) and most met desirable levels of stipulated ambient standards. Biochar seemed to play a major role in removing fluoride from the system which may be due to the existing and adsorbed K+, Ca+2, Mg+2, etc. on the biochar surface via chemisorption. The least reduction was observed for alkalinity. This study indicated potential purification of aforesaid ions in water which are considerably present in RO rejection. Therefore, the invented bio-geo constructed wetland can be considered as a sustainable, economical and effective option for reducing high concentrations of CKDu sensitive parameters in RO rejected water before discharging into the inland waters.

  • Medical geology of endemic goiter in Kalutara, Sri Lanka; distribution and possible causes 2017-12-01


    This study assesses the distribution of goiter in the Kalutara District, Sri Lanka in order to find causative factors for the occurrence of goiter even after the salt iodization. A questionnaire survey was conducted at the household level and at the same time iodine and selenium levels of the water sources were analyzed. Questionnaire survey results indicated the highest numbers of goiter patients in the northern part where the lowest were found in the southern sector which may be due to the presence of acid sulfate soils. Females were more susceptible and it even showed a transmittance between generations. Average iodine concentrations in subsurface water of goiter endemic regions are 28.25 ± 15.47 μg/L whereas non-goiter regions show identical values at 24.74 ± 18.29 μg/L. Surface water exhibited relatively high values at 30.87 ± 16.13 μg/L. Endemic goiter was reported in some isolated patches where iodine and selenium concentrations low, latter was <10 μg/L. The formation of acid sulfate soils in the marshy lands in Kalutara district may lead to transformation of biological available iodine oxidation into volatile iodine by humic substances, at the same time organic matter rich peaty soil may have strong held of iodine and selenium which again induced by low pH and high temperature were suggested as the instrumental factors in the endemic goiter in Kalutara district. Hence, geochemical features such as soil pH, organic matter and thick lateritic cap in the Kalutara goiter endemic area play a role in controlling the available selenium and iodine for food chain through plant uptake and in water.

  • Nickel accumulation in paddy rice on serpentine soils containing high geogenic nickel contents in Taiwan 2017-12-01


    We investigated the extractability of nickel (Ni) in serpentine soils collected from rice paddy fields in eastern Taiwan to evaluate the bioavailability of Ni in the soils as well as for demonstrating the health risks of Ni in rice. Total Ni concentrations in the soils ranged were 70.2–2730 mg/kg (mean, 472 mg/kg), greatly exceeding the natural background content and soil control standard in Taiwan. Available Ni concentration only accounts for <10% of total soil Ni content; 0.1 N HCl-extractable Ni was the more suitable index for Ni bioavailability in the soil to rice than was diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA)-extractable Ni. The accumulation ability of rice roots was much higher than that of its shoots; however, compared with those reported previously, our brown and polished rice samples contained much higher Ni concentrations, within the ranges of 1.50–4.53 and 2.45–5.54 mg/kg, respectively. On the basis of the provisional tolerable Ni intake for adults recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), daily consumption of this rice can result in an excessive Ni intake.