SEGH Articles

Journey from PhD student to employment: difficult but rewarding

21 April 2011
Dr Mark Button has a few words of comfort for students nearing the job market and searching for their future employment

Mark finished his PhD as the worldwide recession began to bite and found it a daunting prospect to find employment at the time.  His experience may be of use to other students in the current economic climate facing the uncertainties of future employment that come in good economic times, let alone recessionary times.  Mark provides a few comments about his journey from stressed PhD student to the workplace, some of which may be of comfort or strike a poignant note with others embarking on a similar journey.

Dr Mark Button completed his PhD in the summer of 2009 entitled ‘Arsenic contaminated soils: human exposure and environmental toxicology' with Leicester University and the British Geological Survey. He employed lab techniques to investigate means of assessing exposure to arsenic from contaminated soils using: earthworms, bioaccessibility testing and toenails for biomonitoring.  Besides the learning of a range of complex lab techniques, he required multidisciplinary skills relevant to many SEGH members, including: GIS, field, statistical and interpersonal skills. 

Mark now works for the Environmental Sciences Group at the Royal Military College in Kingston Ontario, Canada undertaking research on the biotransformation and toxicity of arsenic in the environment with the aim of better understanding how some organisms such as earthworms can be resistant to the harmful effects of arsenic.

What were your fears, hopes, and the reality at the end of your PhD? 

The first challenge was to find positions that matched with the unique set of skills I acquired during my PhD. I wasn't entirely sure what would be the best direction to head in, postdoc, industry, government, or just taking it easy for a while. I hoped something would become clear and it did. I applied for lots of positions that in honesty I did not really want because I felt like I had to be applying. The breakthrough came when I thought more about what I really did want. I contacted the people directly and found myself with possibilities in Austria and Canada.  What boosted my confidence, was that they had seen my publications and were interested in exploring my lines of research.  I would definitely recommend PhD students publishing their work during their PhD on this experience.

How did a PhD benefit you?

As I went into a postdoc research position, my PhD was vital to the work. It felt very strange going from being a student straight into a position where people automatically assumed I was an expert. Having a PhD seems to change the way people see you in the work place. I found it was very important not to let this go to my head.

What did you enjoy about the PhD?

The whole process provided so many opportunities to test and push myself, it was never boring, always challenging and sometimes inspiring. I enjoyed meeting and talking to all kinds of interesting people. My project was multidisciplinary so I found myself learning about analytical chemistry, toxicology, epidemiology, risk assessment; it was exactly the sort of learning I wanted to experience. Then seeing the final creation complete as publications in the scientific literature was a very nice feeling, like I had made a small but worthwhile contribution to our scientific understanding.

What was difficult about the PhD?

I found the level of autonomy difficult at times, keeping a clear direction in mind of what needed to be done, what I wanted to do, what I wanted to avoid doing and how it would all come together required patience and the realization that I needed help from others. Trying not question whether I had done the right thing when the going got tough was a challenge.  It was easy to find reasons to feel anxious and more difficult to stay positive and focused on the many good aspects when the going got tough.

What have you learnt about yourself since?

I learnt that it helps to avoid preconceptions about what experiences will be like, instead of clinging to an idea of how something will be then struggling when it turns out to be different.  It is much more enjoyable to go into things open minded, do your best and go with the flow. I learnt that the biggest limitations are the ones we impose on ourselves by feeling that we will not achieve something. Finishing a PhD has helped me believe that I can achieve things that at first seem too difficult.

What would you liked to have known coming to the end of your PhD that you know now? 

I would like to have known that it was not so serious. At times the pressure felt intense and it was easy to feel isolated. In reality, I was one of many going through the same process and there were always people willing to help in whatever way they could, be they supervisors, fellow students, friends or family. You just need to stay calm and ask for the help you really need.

Tell us something about your overseas experience?

Coming to Canada has been a fantastic opportunity to continue my personal development. Not just academically but in every sense. Again I find myself challenged and engaged in interesting experiences as I did during my PhD. I love the postdoc lifestyle, no thesis to write just the research I am interested in. I have been fortunate to work with Prof Ken Reimer who is very well established in my area of research. I have visited synchrotrons in Chicago and Saskatoon, and been the team leader for fieldwork in Nova Scotia. I have established new techniques in our lab (Comet Assay) and met many more kind and interesting people.

What are some of your hopes for the future?

I try not to think too much about the future, just to know that as long as I am doing my best right now the future will take care of itself. I am open to whatever oportunities present themselves. Environmental research is a vast field so there will always be lots of interesting work to be done.  I enjoy what I am doing and will stick with it as long as I feel enthusiastic and inspired.

 

The photograph shoes Mark riding around the 1 km storage ring at the Advanced Photon Source in Chicago.  The experimental hall is so big that tricycles are regularly used by staff to move around the site.

Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Date palm waste biochars alter a soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, and heavy metal mobility in contaminated mined soil 2017-04-19

    Abstract

    A 30-day incubation experiment was conducted using a heavy metal-contaminated mined soil amended with date palm feedstock (FS) and its derivative biochars (BCs) at three pyrolysis temperatures of 300 (BC-300), 500 (BC-500), and 700 °C (BC-700) with different application rates (0.0, 5, 15, and 30 g kg−1) to investigate their short-term effects on soil respiration (CO2–C efflux), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), soil organic carbon (SOC), mobile fraction of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb, Zn, Mn, and Fe), pH, and electrical conductivity (EC). The results showed that FS and BC-300 with increasing addition rate significantly reduced soil pH, whereas SOC, CO2–C efflux, and soil MBC were increased compared to the control. On the contrary, BC-500 and BC-700 increased soil pH at early stage of incubation and have small or no effects on SOC, CO2–C efflux, and MBC. Based on the results, the date palm biochars exhibited much lower cumulative CO2–C efflux than feedstock, even with low-temperature biochar, indicating that BCs have C sequestration potential. Applying BC-700 at 15 and 30 g kg−1 significantly reduced cumulative CO2–C efflux by 21.8 and 45.4% compared to the control, respectively. The incorporation of FS into contaminated soil significantly increased the mobile content of Cd and Mn, but decreased the mobile content of Cu. However, BC-300 significantly reduced the mobile content of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn. It could be concluded that low-temperature biochar could be used as a soil amendment for reducing heavy metal mobility in mining contaminated soil in addition to minimize soil CO2–C efflux.

  • Historical record of anthropogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a lake sediment from the southern Tibetan Plateau 2017-04-17

    Abstract

    High-altitude lake sediments can be used as natural archives to reconstruct the history of pollutants. In this work, the temporal distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was determined in a sediment core collected from the southern Tibetan Plateau (TP), which was dated by using the 210Pb dating method and validated with the 137Cs fallout peak. The concentrations of the anthropogenic PAHs (Σ8PAH) in the sediment core ranged from 0.83 to 12 ng/g dw, and the fluxes of the Σ8PAH were in the range of 2.1–27 g/cm2/year. The temporal variations in the concentration and input flux of anthropogenic PAHs were low with little variability before the 1950s, and then gradually increased from the 1950s to the 1980s, and an accelerated increase was observed after the early 1980s. The content of total organic carbon played an insignificant role in affecting the time trends of PAHs in the sediment core. Diagnostic concentration fractions of PAH components indicate PAHs in the lake sediment of the southern TP which are mainly from biomass burning and/or from long-range atmospheric transport.

  • Determination of the potential implementation impact of 2016 ministry of environmental protection generic assessment criteria for potentially contaminated sites in China 2017-04-12

    Abstract

    The Ministry of Environmental Protection of China issued a 3rd draft edition of risk-based Generic Assessment Criteria (the MEP-GAC) in March 2016. Since these will be the first authoritative GAC in China, their implementation is likely to have a significant impact on China’s growing contaminated land management sector. This study aims to determine the potential implementation impact of the MEP-GAC through an in-depth analysis of the management context, land use scenarios, health criteria values adopted and exposure pathways considered. The MEP-GAC have been proposed for two broad categories of land use scenarios for contaminated land risk assessment, and these two categories of land use scenarios need to be further delved, and a MEP-GAC for Chinese cultivated land scenario ought to be developed, to ensure human health protection of Chinese farmers. The MEP-GAC have adopted 10−6 as the acceptable lifetime cancer risk, given the widespread extent and severe level of land contamination in China, consideration should be given to the decision on excess lifetime cancer risk of 10−5. During risk assessment process in practice, it is better to review the 20% TDI against local circumstances to determine their suitability before adopting it. The MEP-GAC are based on a SOM value of 1%, for regions with particularly high SOM, it might be necessary to develop regional GAC, due to SOM’s significant impact on the GAC developed. An authoritative risk assessment model developed based on HJ25.3-2014 would help facilitate the DQRA process in practice. The MEP-GAC could better reflect the likely exposures of China’s citizens due to vapour inhalation by using characteristics of Chinese exposure scenarios, including China-generic building stock, as inputs into the Johnson and Ettinger model as opposed to adoption of the US EPA parameters. The MEP-GAC once implemented will set the trajectory for the development of the investigation, assessment and remediation of land contamination for years.