SEGH Articles

Measuring the Bioaccessibility of Potentially Harmful Elements in Soil

01 May 2013
Mark Cave provides some background for bioaccessibility testing and insight into the contribution it has made to the risk assessment industry.
Dr Mark Cave is a leading scientist who has been a major driving force behind the development and adoption of bioaccessibility testing within the risk assessment and contaminated land community.  He is organising an upcoming International Conference in November 2013 at the British Geological Survey, bringing together many world players in bioavailability and bioaccessibility research  Here he provides background for bioaccessibility testing and insight into the contribution it has made to the risk assessment industry.
In terms of human health risk assessment there are three main exposure pathways for a given contaminant present in soil. The largest area of concern is the oral/ingestion pathway followed by the dermal and respiratory exposure routes (Paustenbach, 2000). Whether contaminated soils pose a human health risk depends on the potential of the contaminant to leave the soil and enter the human bloodstream. The use of total contaminant concentrations in soils provides a conservative approach as it assumes that all of the metal present in the soil can enter the bloodstream. Results from animal tests e.g. (Denys et al., 2012) suggest that contaminants in a soil matrix maybe absorbed to a lesser extent and show fewer toxic effects compared to the same concentration of soluble salts of the contaminants in a food or liquid matrix.
There is, therefore, a clear need for a practical methodology that measures the fraction of the contaminant in the soil that, through oral ingestion, can enter the systemic circulation of the human body and cause toxic effects. This is known as the oral bioavailability and can be formally defined as the fraction of an administered dose that reaches the central (blood) compartment from the gastrointestinal tract (Paustenbach, 2000). This term must not to be confused with the oral bioaccessibility of a substance, which is defined as the fraction that is soluble in the gastrointestinal environment and is available for absorption (Paustenbach, 2000).
Since bioavailability data is essentially related to the amount of contaminant in the animal/human bloodstream the data must be produced from the dosing of animals with contaminated soil and the subsequent measurement of the contaminant in the blood or organs of the animal; these are known as in-vivo animal models. Bioaccessibility data, however, is normally determined in a test tube environment (in-vitro) and represents the amount of contaminant dissolved in the gastrointestinal tract prior to crossing the mucosal walls. The amount of pollutant which is actually absorbed by an organism is generally less than or equal to the amount which is mobilised (Paustenbach, 2000). Bioaccessibility extraction tests are generally based around the gastrointestinal parameters of young children (0-3 yr). This age group is thought to be at most risk from accidental ingestion of soil. Also, since children can absorb a higher percentage of contaminant through the digestive system than adults, they are more susceptible to adverse health effects (Hamel et al., 1998).
Mammal dosing trials are time consuming and expensive. To supersede the use of animals in determining the bioavailability of potentially harmful elements for human health risk assessment, or to estimate bioavailability where animal studies are not available, a potential alternative is the use of in-vitro tests.
A number of in vitro bioaccessibility tests for mimicking human ingestion have been reported in the literature. As a result of research carried out by the Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe (BARGE) and other research groups it was clear that the different bioaccessibility tests showed similar trends when used on the same soil samples, but the different operating conditions for each test produced widely ranging bioaccessibility values between the methods (Oomen et al., 2002). To overcome this problem, BARGE undertook a joint decision to progress the development of a harmonised in vitro bioaccessibility method (the Unified BARGE Method – UBM).
The chosen method was the RIVM method (Versantvoort et al., 2004). A schematic outline of the method is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 schematic outline of the BARGE unified method

The UBM has now undergone initial inter-laboratory trials (Wragg et al., 2011) and been validated against an in-vivo model (Denys et al., 2012)and has become widely accepted as the method of choice in European Countries.

In a study of the financial impact of research carried out for the Natural Environment Research Council by the British Geological Survey (Natural Environment Research Council (NERC), 2009) examples of the use of bioaccessibility testing were given that showed that:

i) In one case the assessment enabled the re-use of existing site materials as part of the land remediation process, which subsequently led to reduced costs of approximately £3.75 million. In addition, approximately 3,750 lorry trips to landfill were avoided and 105 tonnes of CO2 equivalent were saved. 

ii) In another example, BGS worked with Land Quality Management and University of Nottingham staff to save between £7-£30 million remediation expenses on one site. The more accurate bioaccessibility testing not only reassured local residents, but also allowed the stalled housing market in the area to restart.

Across England, there are an estimated 15,470 hectares of land in need of remediation. The cost of remediating this land is between £100,000-£325,000 per hectare, giving a potential market of £1.5-£5.0 billion. The research methods developed by BGS have the potential to save between £3.9 million and £12.6 million per year in remediating derelict land for development. Over a 20 year period, these cost savings are estimated to have a Net Present Value of between £55.0 million and £178.6 million.

The method is also being used on a national scale to provide bioaccessibility maps arsenic and Pb (Appleton et al., 2012a, b). Figure 2 shows an example of how a combination of the UBM test and data modelling has produced a map of the bioaccessible lead in soils in the Greater London area.


Figure 2 Estimated bioaccessible Pb in topsoils in the Greater London area (solid lines = motorways, major (A, B) and minor roads; Ordnance Survey Strategi data © Crown copyright 2012) (Appleton et al., 2012b)


Bioaccessibility testing cuts across a number of disciplines including chemistry, geochemistry, toxicology, human health and risk assessment but recent collaborative work untaken by research consortia such as the BARGE group have enabled the development of standardised testing protocols which have a direct impact on human health risk assessment and demonstrable economic benefits when used on a national and international scale.

Dr Mark Cave, British Geological Survey


Appleton, J D, Cave, M R, and Wragg, J. 2012a. Anthropogenic and geogenic impacts on arsenic bioaccessibility in UK topsoils. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. in Press.

Appleton, J D, Cave, M R, and Wragg, J. 2012b. Modelling lead bioaccessibility in urban topsoils based on data from Glasgow, London, Northampton and Swansea, UK. Environmental Pollution, Vol. in Press.

BARGE. Bioaccessibility Research Group of Europe. Cave, M. [cited November 27]. 

Denys, S, Caboche, J, Tack, K, Rychen, G, Wragg, J, Cave, M, Jondreville, C, and Feidt, C. 2012. In Vivo Validation of the Unified BARGE Method to Assess the Bioaccessibility of Arsenic, Antimony, Cadmium, and Lead in Soils. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 46, 6252-6260.

Hamel, S C, Buckley, B, and Lioy, P J. 1998. Bioaccessibility of metals in soils for different liquid to solid ratios in synthetic gastric fluid. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 32, 358-362.

Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). 2009. Bioaccessibility Testing of Contaminated Land for Threats to Human Health.

Oomen, A G, Hack, A, Minekus, M, Zeijdner, E, Cornelis, C, Schoeters, G, Verstraete, W, Van de Wiele, T, Wragg, J, Rompelberg, C J M, Sips, A, and Van Wijnen, J H. 2002. Comparison of five in vitro digestion models to study the bioaccessibility of soil contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 36, 3326-3334.

Paustenbach, D J. 2000. The practice of exposure assessment: A state-of-the-art review (Reprinted from Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 4th edition, 2001). Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews, Vol. 3, 179-291. 

Versantvoort, C H M, Van de Kamp, E, and Rompelberg, C J M. 2004. Development and applicability of an in vitro digestion model in assessing the bioaccessibility of contaminants from food. RIVM, RIVM report 320102002/2004 (Bilthoven).

Wragg, J, Cave, M R, Basta, N, Brandon, E, Casteel, S, Denys, S e b, Gron, C, Oomen, A, Reimer, K, Tack, K, and Van de Wiele, T. 2011. An Inter-laboratory Trial of the Unified BARGE Bioaccessibility Method for Arsenic, Cadmium and Lead in Soil. Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 409, 4016-4030.




Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Geophagy among East African Chimpanzees: consumed soils provide protection from plant secondary compounds and bioavailable iron 2019-12-01


    Geophagy, the intentional consumption of earth materials, has been recorded in humans and other animals. It has been hypothesized that geophagy is an adaptive behavior, and that clay minerals commonly found in eaten soil can provide protection from toxins and/or supplement micronutrients. To test these hypotheses, we monitored chimpanzee geophagy using camera traps in four permanent sites at the Budongo Forest Reserve, Uganda, from October 2015–October 2016. We also collected plants, and soil chimpanzees were observed eating. We analyzed 10 plant and 45 soil samples to characterize geophagic behavior and geophagic soil and determine (1) whether micronutrients are available from the soil under physiological conditions and if iron is bioavailable, (2) the concentration of phenolic compounds in plants, and (3) if consumed soils are able to adsorb these phenolics. Chimpanzees ate soil and drank clay-infused water containing 1:1 and 2:1 clay minerals and > 30% sand. Under physiological conditions, the soils released calcium, iron, and magnesium. In vitro Caco-2 experiments found that five times more iron was bioavailable from three of four soil samples found at the base of trees. Plant samples contained approximately 60 μg/mg gallic acid equivalent. Soil from one site contained 10 times more 2:1 clay minerals, which were better at removing phenolics present in their diet. We suggest that geophagy may provide bioavailable iron and protection from phenolics, which have increased in plants over the last 20 years. In summary, geophagy within the Sonso community is multifunctional and may be an important self-medicative behavior.

  • Accumulation of uranium and heavy metals in the soil–plant system in Xiazhuang uranium ore field, Guangdong Province, China 2019-12-01


    Plants that have grown for many years in the special environmental conditions prevailing in mining areas are naturally screened and show strong capacity to adapt to their environment. The present study investigated the enrichment characteristics of U and other heavy metals (As, Cu, Pb, Mn, Mo, Zn, Cd, Co, and Ni) in the soil–plant system in Xiazhuang uranium mine. Four dominant plants (Castanopsis carlesii, Rhus chinensis, Liriodendron chinense, and Sapium discolor) and soil samples were collected from the mined areas, unmined areas, and background areas away from the ore field. U, As, Cu, Pb, Mn, Mo, Zn, Cd, Co, and Ni concentrations were analyzed by ICP-MS. The results demonstrate that (1) The highest concentrations of U (4.1–206.9 mg/kg) and Pb (43.3–126.0 mg/kg) with the geoaccumulation index (Igeo) greater than 1 show that they are the main soil pollutants in the research area. (2) The biological accumulation coefficient (LBAC) values for Cd, Mn, and Cu are greater than zero in S. discolor, L. chinense, and C. carlesii and these three plants indicate that they can be used for remediation of the soil in the ore field. (3) R. chinensis inhibits the accumulation of heavy metals and shows sensitive pigment responses to the accumulation of U in the leaves. L. chinense has the strongest enrichment effect on heavy metals but exhibits weak biochemical responses under U stress. C. carlesii demonstrates strong adaptation to U and can maintain healthy pigment characteristics in case of high U enrichment. (4) S. discolor, L. chinense, C. carlesii and R. chinensis have strong tolerance to U toxicity and different biochemical responses.

  • Distribution, sources and health risk assessment of contaminations in water of urban park: A case study in Northeast China 2019-12-01


    This case study was performed to determine whether the pollutants in water of urban park could bring health risk to human engaging in water-related activities such as swimming and provide evidence demonstrating the critical need for strengthened recreational water resources management of urban park. TN, NH4+-N, TP, Cu, Mn, Zn, Se, Pb, As, Cd and Cr(VI) contents were determined to describe the spatial distribution of contaminations; sources apportionment with the method of correlation analysis, factor analysis and cluster analysis were followed by health risk assessment for swimmers of different age groups. The results reveal that element contents in all sites do not exceed Chinese standard for swimming area and European Commission standard for surface water; all detected elements except Cr(VI) have a tendency to accumulate in the location of lake crossing bridge; Mn and Zn are considered to have the same pollution source including geogenic and anthropogenic sources by multivariable analysis. Carcinogenic risks of different age groups descend in the same order with non-carcinogenic risks. Among all elements, Zn and Mn contribute the lowest non-carcinogenic risk (5.1940E-06) and the highest non-carcinogenic risk (7.9921E-04) through skin contact pathway, respectively. The total average personal risk for swimmers in swimming area is 1.9693E-03, and this site is not suitable for swimming. Overall, it is possible that swimmers are exposed to risk via the dermal route when carrying out water-related activities, it is recommended that necessary precautions and management should be taken in other similar locations around the world.