SEGH Articles

Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency: The Role of Specialty Fertilizers

13 March 2018
The International Fertilizer Association (IFA) held its Task Force and Strategic Forum Meeting in Zurich, Switzerland on Nov 13-15, 2017. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss and prepare the Fertilizer Industry for the challenges foreseen by 2030 along with a special focus on Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency: The Role of Specialty Fertilizers. Dr Munir Zia provides SEGH readers with a brief overview of this topic.

Nutrient Use Efficiency (NUE) is defined as yield per unit input. In agriculture this is usually related to the input of fertilizer, whereas in the scientific literature the NUE is often expressed as fresh weight or product yield per content of nutrient. Improvement of NUE is an essential pre-requisite for the expansion of crop production into marginal lands with low nutrient(s) availability. There are many forms of NUE. Four of them are commonly used (source: Hemantaranjan 2013):

1. Partial factor productivity -PFP (crop yield per unit of nutrient applied) tells us how productive the cropping system is in comparison to its nutrient input.

2. Partial nutrient budget –PNB (nutrient in harvested crop per unit of nutrient applied) tells us how much nutrient is taken out of the system in relation to the amount put in.

3. Agronomic efficiency –AE (yield increase per unit of nutrient applied) answers a more direct question: “How much productivity improvement was gained by the use of this nutrient?”

4. Recovery efficiency – RE (increase in above-ground crop uptake per unit of nutrient applied) tells us how much of the nutrient applied was taken up by the plant.

NUE in Pakistan: nitrogenous (N) and phosphatic (P) fertilizer use efficiency are only 30-60% and 15-20%, respectively. Pakistan is ranked lowest among neighboring countries for nitrogenous fertilizer use efficiency (Table 1):

 

Table 1: nitrogenous (N) fertilizers use efficiency

Country

Area

(million ha)

 

Mean Cereal Yield

(t/ha)

Mean Nitrogen Rate

(kg/ha)

PFP

(kg grain/kg N)

PNB

(kg N grain/ kg fertilizer N)

Bangladesh

11.18

4.02

93

44

0.69

China

83.14

5.48

172

32

0.50

Egypt

2.99

7.01

252

28

0.44

India

99.24

2.56

95

28

0.43

Pakistan

12.93

2.58

124

21

0.33

Turkey

13.04

2.68

68

39

0.62

USA     

52.86

6.69

144

47

0.74

World

679.08

3.43

81

43

0.67

Ref.: IPNI-2014

PFP = Partial Factor Productivity of nitrogenous fertilizer; PNB = Partial Nutrient Balance of nitrogenous fertilizer

 

Table 1 shows comparative nitrogenous fertilizer performance indicators. Pakistan has the lowest NUE computed as Partial Factor Productivity (PFP) - that is 21 kg of cereal grains/kg of N fertilizer. The second indicator (the Partial Nutrient Balance (PNB) - a ratio: kg N recovered/kg of N applied) is also the lowest (0.33%).

The N performance indicators for Pakistan are lowest among countries and even of world average, which suggests imbalanced application of nutrient N with special reference to phosphorus, potassium, and other micronutrient fertilizers. In case of phosphatic fertilizers, agronomic efficiency (AE) for wheat is about 9 kg /kg of applied phosphorus. Such low fertilizer use efficiencies are partially responsible for yield gaps in Pakistan.

Measures to Enhance NUE

i.        Specialty fertilizers – controlled release fertilizers

    ii.        Genetics and management practices assuring maximum economic yields

   iii.        Precision agriculture technologies to sense crop needs and improve application

   iv.        Increased use of on-farm measures evaluating nutrient use efficiency

    v.        Decision support tools applying science at the farm level

 

Specialty Fertilizers are customized and/or fortified fertilizers developed specifically to enhance NUE, e.g. granular fertilizer particles that help gradual release of fertilizer nutrients to match crop(s) requirements, usually over a few weeks/months (see Figure 1).

 Munir Fertilizer Granule

Figure. 1 Diffusion mechanism of controlled release of Nitrogen from fertilizer granule

 

Specialty fertilizers are intended to provide the following benefits:

  • INCREASE YIELD with same fertilizer dose
  • MAINTAIN YIELD with lower fertilizer dose
  • INCREASE YIELD with lower fertilizer dose

 

Specialty fertilizers can be grouped into three categories:

  • Slow and/or controlled release fertilizers (e.g. polymer coated urea)
  • Fortified secondary and micronutrients (e.g. chelated zinc)
  • Customized N-P-K grades; and fully water soluble grades etc. (e.g. N-P-K-S 15:15:15-10)

 

At present, major multinational fertilizer companies are focusing on development of controlled release fertilizers that can be subdivided into three categories:

  • Organic compounds (e.g., humate coated urea)
  • Water soluble fertilizers with a physical barrier to control the release of nutrients (e.g. polymer urea)
  • Inorganic low solubility compounds (e.g. partially acidulated rock phosphate)

 

Global Market of specialty fertilizers is projected to reach $20 billion by 2020. Major global players include:

Yara International (Norway)

Agrium Inc. (Canada)

The Mosaic Company (US)

Sinochem Group (China)

Sociedad Quimicay Minera S.A. (Chile)

Haifa Chemicals Ltd. (Israel)

In the US, a premium of 16-35% is charged over such specialty products. Below is a summary of coating materials used to produce Controlled Release Urea Fertilizer on a commercial scale. Until now, no breakthrough has been reported in the controlled release of phosphorus from MAP/DAP/TSP fertilizers.

Table 2: Commercial scale controlled release fertilizers and coating materials

Commercial name

Composition of coating material

Company

SCU

Sulfur+wax + diatomaceous earth + coal tar

Tennessee Valley Authority, USA

Meister

 

Polyolefin + inorganic powder

Chisso Co. Kitakysya, Japan

LP30/LPS40/LPSS 100

Polyolefin

Chisso-Asahi Fertilizer Corporation

CRU

Polymeric material

Agrium Inc. Canada

CU & CUS

Polymeric material

Chisso-Asahi Fertilizer Corporation

PCF

Polyurethane-like

Haifa Chemicals Ltd. Israel

Zn-coated urea

Zinc oxide

Indo-Gulf Fertilizers, India

Agrium PCU

Polymeric material

Agrium US Inc.

Kingenta PCU

Polymeric material

Shandong Kingenta Ecological Engineering Co. Ltd. China

 

In Pakistan other than Neem Coated Urea, only three commercial scale fertilizer products (Nurea - sulfur coated urea 36% N; calcium ammonium nitrate; and zinc-coated urea) fall under the category of specialty fertilizers.

 

References:

Hemantaranjan. A, Physiology of Nutrition and Environmental Stresses on Crop Productivity, Scientific Publishers (2014).

 

 


Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Total arsenic concentrations in Chinese children’s urine by different geographic locations, ages, and genders 2018-06-01

    Abstract

    Little is known about the variation of Chinese children’s exposure to arsenic by geography, age, gender, and other potential factors. The main objective of this study was to investigate the total arsenic concentration in Chinese children’s urine by geographic locations, ages, and genders. In total, 259 24-h urine samples were collected from 210 2- to 12-year-old children in China and analyzed for total arsenic and creatinine concentrations. The results showed that the upper limit (upper limit of the 90% confidence interval for the 97.5 fractile) was 27.51 µg/L or 55.88 µg/g creatinine for Chinese children. The total urinary arsenic levels were significantly different for children in Guangdong, Hubei, and Gansu provinces (P < 0.05), where the upper limits were 24.29, 58.70, and 44.29 µg/g creatinine, respectively. In addition, the total urinary arsenic levels were higher for 2- to 7-year-old children than for 7- to 12-year-old children (P < 0.05; the upper limits were 59.06 and 44.29 µg/g creatinine, respectively) and higher for rural children than for urban children (P < 0.05; the upper limits were 59.06 and 50.44 µg/g creatinine, respectively). The total urinary arsenic levels for boys were not significantly different from those for girls (P > 0.05), although the level for boys (the upper limit was 59.30 µg/g) was slightly higher than that for girls (the upper limit was 58.64 µg/g creatinine). Because the total urinary arsenic concentrations are significantly different for general populations of children in different locations and age groups, the reference level of total urinary arsenic might be dependent on the geographic site and the child’s age.

  • The pollution characteristics of PM 2.5 and correlation analysis with meteorological parameters in Xinxiang during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Prime Ministers’ Meeting 2018-06-01

    Abstract

    The pollution characteristics of PM2.5 and correlation analysis with meteorological parameters in Xinxiang during the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Prime Ministers’ Meeting were investigated. During the whole meeting, nine PM2.5 samples were collected at a suburban site of Xinxiang, and the average concentration of PM2.5 was 122.28 μg m−3. NO3 , NH4 +, SO4 2− accounted for 56.8% of the total water-soluble ions. In addition, with an exception of Cl, all of water-soluble ions decreased during the meeting. Total concentrations of crustal elements ranged from 6.53 to 185.86 μg m−3, with an average concentration of 52.51 μg m−3, which accounted for 82.5% of total elements. The concentrations of organic carbon and elemental carbon were 7.71 and 1.52 μg m−3, respectively, lower than those before and after the meeting. It is indicated that during the meeting, limiting motor vehicles is to reduce exhaust emissions, delay heating is to reduce the fossil fuel combustion, and other measures are to reduce the concentration of PM2.5. The directly dispersing by mixing layer height increase and the indirectly reducing the formation of secondary aerosol by low relative humidity, and these are the only two key removing mechanisms of PM2.5 in Xinxiang during the meeting.

  • Review of total suspended particles (TSP) and PM 2.5 concentration variations in Asia during the years of 1998–2015 2018-06-01

    Abstract

    In Asian countries such as China, Malaysia, Pakistan, India, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and Hong Kong, ambient air total suspended particulates and PM2.5 concentration data were collected and discussed during the years of 1998–2015 in this study. The aim of the present study was to (1) investigate and collect ambient air total suspended particulates (TSP) and PM2.5 concentrations for Asian countries during the past two decades. (2) Discuss, analyze and compare those particulates (TSP and PM2.5) annual concentration distribution trends among those Asian countries during the past two decades. (3) Test the mean concentration differences in TSP and PM2.5 among the Asian countries during the past decades. The results indicated that the mean TSP concentration order was shown as China > Malaysia > Pakistan > India > Taiwan > Korea > Japan. In addition, the mean PM2.5 concentration order was shown as Vietnam > India > China > Hong Kong > Mongolia > Korea > Taiwan > Japan and the average percentages of PM2.5 concentrations for Taiwan, China, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Mongolia and Other (India and Vietnam) were 8, 21, 6, 8, 14, 13 and 30%, respectively, during the past two decades. Moreover, t test results revealed that there were significant mean TSP and PM2.5 concentration differences for either China or India to any of the countries such as Taiwan, Korea and Japan in Asia during the past two decades for this study. Noteworthy, China and India are both occupied more than 60% of the TSP and PM2.5 particulates concentrations out of all the Asia countries. As for Taiwan, the average PM2.5 concentration displayed increasing trend in the years of 1998–1999. However, it showed decreasing trend in the years of 2000–2010. As for Korea, the average PM2.5 concentrations showed decreasing trend during the years of 2001–2013. Finally, the average PM2.5 concentrations for Mongolia displayed increasing trend in the years of 2004–2013.