SEGH Articles

Environmental Geochemistry in Greece: Opportunities and obstacles to development

28 September 2015
What are the opportunities and obstacles to development in the field of environmental geochemistry and health in Greece nowadays?

In the middle of an economic crisis that lasts over five years, Greek scientists are faced with enormous challenges as they try to remain focused on their research while coping with low career prospects and salary cuts. Although there is no easy answer, this article contains some thoughts on the burning question: What are the opportunities and obstacles to development in the field of environmental geochemistry and health in Greece nowadays?

Greece is characterised by an exceptionally interesting geological terrain. Laying at the edge of the European Continent, the Hellenic arc is geologically a very active area that provides the opportunity to observe and study a variety of earth system processes, ranging from typical manifestations of orogeny (including several types of ore deposits, active volcanoes and intense seismicity) to sensitive terrestrial, marine and coastal environments. As such, there are plenty "natural laboratories" providing opportunities to study environmental feedbacks and processes in action (e.g. http://www.nature.com/articles/srep12152). Furthermore, the long human history of Greece, combined with the lack of an Industrial Revolution legacy makes a very interesting case for studying the anthropogenic influence on the chemical environment through time. A key obstacle in the development is that despite its extremely rich natural capital, the country lags behind in regional baseline studies with respect to soil, sediment and water geochemistry, not to mention accessible health or epidemiological data. Systematic geochemical data are scarce and maps are only available for a few areas and at local scale (e.g. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969714003234). The Greek Geological Survey (IGME) in cooperation with earth science university departments across Greece could play a leading role in the development and publication of the much needed regional geochemical databases. There are at least 4 university departments that could contribute to this effort.

However, the task seems a particularly difficult one under the present economic situation. The economic and financial crisis has left a strong mark on research and innovation policies as it shifted the attention of government onto macroeconomic stabilisation, while research and innovation have become rather an ‘orphan’ in the highest political discussions (Izsak et al, 2013). Institutional funding, such as general university funds and operational costs for Research Organisations and Universities, has since 2009 been further reduced due to the salary cuts for researchers and academics, the cutback of other operational costs, and the restructuring of the public research sector through mergers. On top of this, insufficient funding absorption had been identified even before the crisis hit the country. Although Greek scientists have been very successful in winning funding from the FP7, being awarded more euros per researcher than almost any other European Union (EU) country, the planned reforms, spurred by the financial crisis, failed to capitalise on these successes as it was initially believed (Abbott, 2011). During the crisis in Greece the severely reduced budget of the Public Investment Programme led to the limited absorption of the Structural Funds - almost the only available resource for funding research development and innovation projects. The low R&D capacity and links between academia and industry may partially explain this outcome.

Many Greek scientists living and working in Greece today agree that the ongoing damage to Greek scientific research is not solely due to austerity measures. According to Kevin Featherstone (2015), an ex-member of Greece’s National Council for Research and Technology, political manipulation and institutional weakness are contributing to the situation. In his article he brings out the example of the open, competitive grant scheme (called Aristeia, or excellence) based on the European Research Council model introduced by the council in 2011 in order to address the dire problem of underfunded research. The scheme ran only for two rounds, during which the council had to battle against other governmental forces to maintain its EU funding and was then abandoned. Featherstone's concluding comment reads: "The council’s experience reflects the wider problems of Greece’s government: how it seeks and receives expert advice, the public status of this process and the near-impossibility of rational, stable long-term planning". The above described situation as well as pre-existing obstacles such as the low remuneration levels for researchers and limited career progression prospects compared to the offer in other Western and Northern European countries is also the root to a severe brain drain phenomenon within the research community in Greece; geosciences are not an exception in this. Brain drain nonetheless also goes beyond researchers to include for example engineers, architects, health care workers etc. who given high unemployment rates search for jobs beyond our own borders (Izsak et al, 2013).

So, one wonders if there is a way out of the vicious circle and any chance for development in the field of environmental geochemistry in Greece at the moment? A first step might be for the Greek researchers to try avoid introversion and keep alive the links with the international scientific community. SEGH has been a very successful community in making networking opportunities through its annual conferences and meetings as well as by participating in SEGH badged events. Within this frame the forthcoming event of the 14th International Conference of the Greek Geological Society, organised by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece in 25-27 May 2016 provides an excellent opportunity for sharing expertise and to get a flavour of the current research advancements in Greece. The primary goal of the Conference is the presentation of the most recent advances in Geo- and Environmental Sciences, mainly in the Aegean Region and its surroundings, aiming at highlighting their impacts on natural resources, natural hazards, and environmental problems. A special session of the conference, entitled "Environmental Geochemistry: mobility and speciation of chemical elements in the system rock-soil-water-plant" is endorsed by SEGH. The session aims to bring together cross‐disciplinary scientists including geologists and geochemists, soil and plant scientists, engineers and environmental chemists and to provide the opportunity for exchanging knowledge and experiences from the Aegean Region and beyond, fostering future collaboration in the field of study. For more information about the conference and the submission procedures, please visit its website at www.ege2016.gr. The extended deadline for submitting papers and early registration is October 25, 2015.


by Dr Ariadne Argyraki, 

University of Athens



References

Abbott, A. (2011). Greek crisis spurs research reforms. Nature, 475, 13-14.

Featherstone, K. (2015) Greek politics stall research reforms. Nature, 518, 167.

Izsak, K., Markianidou, P., Lukach, R., Wastyn, A. (2013). The impact of the crisis on research and innovation policies. Study for the European Commission DG Research by Technopolis Group Belgium and Idea Consult.

Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Fate and partitioning of heavy metals in soils from landfill sites in Cape Town, South Africa: a health risk approach to data interpretation 2019-06-14

    Abstract

    The fate and persistence of trace metals in soils and sludge from landfill sites are crucial in determining the hazard posed by landfill, techniques for their restoration and potential reuse purposes of landfill sites after closure and restoration. A modified European Community Bureau of Reference’s (BCR) sequential extraction procedure was applied for partitioning and evaluating the mobility and persistence of trace metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Zn) in soils from three landfill sites and sludge sample from Cape Town, South Africa. Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy was used to analyze BCR extracts. The mobility sequence based on the BCR mobile fraction showed that Cu (74–87%), Pb (65–80%), Zn (59–82%) and Cd (55–66%) constituted the mobile metals in the soils from the three sites. The mobility of Cu, Zn and Ni (> 95%) was particularly high in the sludge sample, which showed significant enrichment compared to the soil samples. Geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and risk assessment code were used to further assess the environmental risk of the metals in the soils. Exposure to the soils and sludge did not pose any non-cancer risks to adult and children as the hazard quotient and hazard index values were all below the safe level of 1. The cancer risks from Cd, Cr and Ni require that remedial action be considered during closure and restoration of the landfill sites.

  • An investigation into the use of < 38 µm fraction as a proxy for < 10 µm road dust particles 2019-06-13

    Abstract

    It is well documented that a large portion of urban particulate matters is derived from road dust. Isolating particles of RD which are small enough to be inhaled, however, is a difficult process. In this study, it is shown for the first time that the < 38 µm fraction of road dust particles can be used as a proxy for road dust particles < 10 µm in bioaccessibility studies. This study probed similarities between the < 10 and < 38µm fractions of urban road dust to show that the larger of the two can be used for analysis for which larger sample masses are required, as is the case with in vitro analysis. Road dust, initially segregated to size < 38 µm using sieves, was again size segregated to < 10 µm using water deposition. Both the original < 38 µm and the separated < 10 µm fractions were then subject to single particle analysis by SEM–EDX and bulk analysis by ICP-OES for its elemental composition. Dissolution tests in artificial lysosomal fluid, representative of lung fluid, were carried out on both samples to determine % bioaccessibility of selected potentially harmful elements and thus probe similarities/differences in in vitro behaviour between the two fractions. The separation technique achieved 94.3% of particles < 10 µm in terms of number of particles (the original sample contained 90.4% as determined by SEM–EDX). Acid-soluble metal concentration results indicated differences between the samples. However, when manipulated to negate the input of Si, SEM–EDX data showed general similarities in metal concentrations. Dissolution testing results indicated similar behaviour between the two samples in a simulated biological fluid.

  • Degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in unsaturated soil and effects on subsequent biodegradation by potassium permanganate 2019-06-13

    Abstract

    To date, the oxidation of petroleum hydrocarbons using permanganate has been investigated rarely. Only a few studies on the remediation of unsaturated soil using permanganate can be found in the literature. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study conducted using permanganate pretreatment to degrade petroleum hydrocarbons in unsaturated soil in combination with subsequent bioaugmentation. The pretreatment of diesel-contaminated unsaturated soil with 0.5-pore-volume (5%) potassium permanganate (PP) by solution pouring and foam spraying (with a surfactant) achieved the total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) removal efficiencies of 37% and 72.1%, respectively. The PP foam, when coupled with bioaugmentation foam, further degraded the TPH to a final concentration of 438 mg/kg (92.1% total reduction). The experiment was conducted without soil mixing or disturbance. The relatively high TPH removal efficiency achieved by the PP–bioaugmentation serial foam application may be attributed to an increase in soil pH caused by the PP and effective infiltration of the remediation agent by foaming. The applied PP foam increased the pH of the acidic soil, thus enhancing microbial activity. The first-order biodegradation rate after PP oxidation was calculated to be 0.068 d−1. Furthermore, 94% of the group of relatively persistent hydrocarbons (C18–C22) was removed by PP–bioaugmentation, as verified by chromatogram peaks. Some physicochemical parameters related to contaminant removal efficiency were also evaluated. The results reveal that PP can degrade soil TPH and significantly enhance the biodegradation rate in unsaturated diesel-contaminated soil when combined with bioaugmentation foam.