SEGH Articles

Putting the Health in SEGH

18 November 2015
Dr Alex Stewart, recently retired from Public Health England, has been an active member of the SEGH International board over many years and a major driving force in bringing the health community together with environmental scientists to promote inter-disciplinary research.

Dr Alex Stewart retired at the end of June as a Consultant in Health Protection for Public Health England, for which his responsibilities included the recognition, characterisation and response to the health effects of environmental issues, including the geochemical components.  Dr Stewart has been involved in SEGH activities for about 20 years, having gained experience and an interest in linking environmental geochemistry and its influence on human health through his interest in iodine deficiency in his years as a GP in the Karakoram mountains of northern Pakistan.

We take the opportunity to ask a few questions of Alex to gain an insight into his extensive experience to the benefit of other scientists at any stage of their career.  In addition, Alex gives us some idea of his plans for the future and his continued engagement with SEGH.

When you started out on your career, what were your fears, hopes, and the reality?  Were there any surprises along the way? 

As a young medical doctor I wanted to work in the wilder parts of the world, but wondered if I was up to it. I was able to join an experienced doctor in starting the General Practice in Baltistan, northern Pakistan, where the health services were thin, stretched and of limited ability. When my colleague retired a few years later, I took over with confidence and developed the work. Perhaps the biggest surprise was my ability to adapt good medical practice in a situation where resources were limited (we ran an outpatient clinic without nearby hospital or laboratory support) and the villagers did not always return quickly for review. It was sometimes hard to know if patients had died, got better or decided my treatments were not worth having! This made learning about what worked and what did not a lot slower but eventually earned me local respect because I was able to ground the medical work in a deep knowledge of the local community.

How were the environmental and health sciences considered early in your career and was there much collaboration between disciplines at the time?

We in health had little understanding of the impact of environmental issues on health, particularly when I was a student and young doctor. Doctors still largely concentrate on the person sitting in our consulting room and ignore wider issues, including, sadly, family and social aspects. The natural environment hardly came into my early understanding of health and disease.

Was there any one event that stood out for yourself personally that influenced your career or the perception of geochemical and health research?

The sharpest event that affected my perception of geochemistry and health was an evening in our house in Baltistan with two passing geologists from Oxford. They were studying the Main Karakoram Thrust, often by binoculars from their jeep in the valley, covering a lot of ground quickly: Baltistan is dry, with very little soil cover on the rocks, so the basic geology can be quite clear in many places. I had become interested in the locally perceived differences in the prevalence of goitre (thyroid swelling in the neck due, in this area, to iodine deficiency) between our side of the river (“1/100”, I was told) and the inhabitants of the villages across the river (“1/10” was the local comment). I had looked and asked about differences between the two sides of the valley and could find nothing that made sense until these passing geologists showed me the Main Karakoram Thrust and indicated its importance as the boundary between Asia (the far side) and the Island Arc north of India (our side). As I began to look into this it was clear that plate tectonics played some part in the distribution of the iodine deficiency disorders across northern Pakistan and perhaps further afield (Stewart AG. Drifting continents and endemic goitre in northern Pakistan. British Medical Journal, 1990; 300: 1507-1512). Following this through led eventually to my appointment as a Consultant in Health Protection with interest in and responsibility for environmental issues (e.g. Mahoney G, Stewart AG, Kennedy N, Whitely B, Turner L, Wilkinson E. Achieving attainable outcomes from good science in an untidy world: Case studies in land and air pollution. Environmental Geochemistry & Health. 2015; 37: 689-706.).

How has your involvement in SEGH helped in your career and enjoyment of your work?

SEGH has been of enormous support, stimulation and help in my career over the past 20-odd years. I first encountered it at a halogen meeting in Kingston-upon-Thames while home on leave in 1994. I went to hear Ron Fuge, the iodine guru from Aberystwyth. Although Ron was unable to attend the meeting at the last minute, I found some of the other presentations fascinating and Joy Carter (former SEGH President), at Reading in those days, enrolled me into SEGH. This encouraged me (particularly after our sudden and unexpected return to the UK in 1996 after the Pakistani Government asked us to leave, reasons unstated) to build friendships, read the journal, and attend meetings. Through the SEGH meetings, in particular, I met a lot of fascinating people and learned a lot more than I could have imagined about the environment, geochemistry and possible influences on health. I also gave presentations or posters which were probed in the SEGH gentle but knowledgeable manner, helping develop my thinking on a number of issues. I have been delighted to serve on the SEGH board; SEGH has been a constant during periods of diminished support for environmental public health issues in the health protection arena (Stewart AG, Worsley A, Holden V, Hursthouse AS. Evaluating the impact of interdisciplinary networking in Environmental Geochemistry and Health: Reviewing SEGH conferences and workshops. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, Special edition. 2012; 34(6): 653-664).

Do you have any advice for young scientists setting out on their careers in environmental geochemistry or health sciences?

Don’t be afraid of cross-boundary work: that’s where exciting challenges and discoveries are to be made in any subject. Develop friendships and relationships with people outside your speciality, learn their scientific language and ways of thinking and undertake joint work. You never know where that will lead.

What do you consider to be the important topics for environmental-geochemistry-health related research in the future?

We need to continue our interest in elemental chemistry, but move beyond metals into organics, into volatiles, building relationships with air-scientists to look at the unseen pollution and health effects of fine and ultra-fine particles. I think linking the genetic fingerprint of cancers with specific toxins will enable us to identify, control and reduce/prevent specific diseases. However, this cannot be done by either geochemists or health professionals alone, but only in collaboration. Collaboration means both sides actively being involved in each other’s research proposals and activities, not just bolting two different approaches together.

What are some of your hopes for the future?

I would dearly like to see more health professionals involved with SEGH, but have run out of ideas how to involve them. I hope the younger generation of scientists can succeed where I have been unsuccessful.

Now that I am retired I hope to have some time to examine some of the environmental-health questions that have sat on my desk for 10+ years, such as: Does environmental iodine deficiency exist? What is the explanation for the global distribution of iodine deficiency disorders? What is the environmental input, if any, into lung cancer in North West England? Could some of the ill-health of deprived communities in industrialised countries be due to historical pollution, perhaps through trans-generational mechanisms?

 

On a personal note, Alex has made an important contribution to SEGH's encouragement of cross disciplinary work across geochemistry and health sciences, both in the UK and through European meetings.  Alex's tireless enthusiasm has helped to provide a platform from which the following generation of cross disciplinary scientists are less inhibited by the artificial boundaries.  Fortunately, Alex will continue to be engaged with SEGH, clearly with some exciting issues to pursue in retirement.

by Dr Michael Watts

British Geological Survey (SEGH webmaster)

Keep up to date

Submit Content

Members can keep in touch with their colleagues through short news and events articles of interest to the SEGH community.

Science in the News

Latest on-line papers from the SEGH journal: Environmental Geochemistry and Health

  • Ecological impact of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin on microbial community of aerobic activated sludge 2019-08-16

    Abstract

    This study investigated the effects and fate of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin (CIP) at environmentally relevant levels (50–500 µg/L) in activated sludge (AS) microbial communities under aerobic conditions. Exposure to 500 µg/L of CIP decreased species diversity by about 20% and significantly altered the phylogenetic structure of AS communities compared to those of control communities (no CIP exposure), while there were no significant changes upon exposure to 50 µg/L of CIP. Analysis of community composition revealed that exposure to 500 µg/L of CIP significantly reduced the relative abundance of Rhodobacteraceae and Nakamurellaceae by more than tenfold. These species frequently occur in AS communities across many full-scale wastewater treatment plants and are involved in key ecosystem functions (i.e., organic matter and nitrogen removal). Our analyses showed that 50–500 µg/L CIP was poorly removed in AS (about 20% removal), implying that the majority of CIP from AS processes may be released with either their effluents or waste sludge. We therefore strongly recommend further research on CIP residuals and/or post-treatment processes (e.g., anaerobic digestion) for waste streams that may cause ecological risks in receiving water bodies.

  • Source and background threshold values of potentially toxic elements in soils by multivariate statistics and GIS-based mapping: a high density sampling survey in the Parauapebas basin, Brazilian Amazon 2019-08-10

    Abstract

    A high-density regional-scale soil geochemical survey comprising 727 samples (one sample per each 5 × 5 km grid) was carried out in the Parauapebas sub-basin of the Brazilian Amazonia, under the Itacaiúnas Basin Geochemical Mapping and Background Project. Samples were taken from two depths at each site: surface soil, 0–20 cm and deep soil, 30–50 cm. The ground and sieved (< 75 µm) fraction was digested using aqua regia and analyzed for 51 elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS). All data were used here, but the principal focus was on the potential toxic elements (PTEs) and Fe and Mn to evaluate the spatial distribution patterns and to establish their geochemical background concentrations in soils. Geochemical maps as well as principal component analysis (PCA) show that the distribution patterns of the elements are very similar between surface and deep soils. The PCA, applied on clr-transformed data, identified four major associations: Fe–Ti–V–Sc–Cu–Cr–Ni (Gp-1); Zr–Hf–U–Nb–Th–Al–P–Mo–Ga (Gp-2); K–Na–Ca–Mg–Ba–Rb–Sr (Gp-3); and La–Ce–Co–Mn–Y–Zn–Cd (Gp-4). Moreover, the distribution patterns of elements varied significantly among the three major geological domains. The whole data indicate a strong imprint of local geological setting in the geochemical associations and point to a dominant geogenic origin for the analyzed elements. Copper and Fe in Gp-1 were enriched in the Carajás basin and are associated with metavolcanic rocks and banded-iron formations, respectively. However, the spatial distribution of Cu is also highly influenced by two hydrothermal mineralized copper belts. Ni–Cr in Gp-1 are highly correlated and spatially associated with mafic and ultramafic units. The Gp-2 is partially composed of high field strength elements (Zr, Hf, Nb, U, Th) that could be linked to occurrences of A-type Neoarchean granites. The Gp-3 elements are mobile elements which are commonly found in feldspars and other rock-forming minerals being liberated by chemical weathering. The background threshold values (BTV) were estimated separately for surface and deep soils using different methods. The ‘75th percentile’, which commonly used for the estimation of the quality reference values (QRVs) following the Brazilian regulation, gave more restrictive or conservative (low) BTVs, while the ‘MMAD’ was more realistic to define high BTVs that can better represent the so-called mineralized/normal background. Compared with CONAMA Resolution (No. 420/2009), the conservative BTVs of most of the toxic elements were below the prevention limits (PV), except Cu, but when the high BTVs are considered, Cu, Co, Cr and Ni exceeded the PV limits. The degree of contamination (Cdeg), based on the conservative BTVs, indicates low contamination, except in the Carajás basin, which shows many anomalies and had high contamination mainly from Cu, Cr and Ni, but this is similar between surface and deep soils indicating that the observed high anomalies are strictly related to geogenic control. This is supported when the Cdeg is calculated using the high BTVs, which indicates low contamination. This suggests that the use of only conservative BTVs for the entire region might overestimate the significance of anthropogenic contamination; thus, we suggest the use of high BTVs for effective assessment of soil contamination in this region. The methodology and results of this study may help developing strategies for geochemical mapping in other Carajás soils or in other Amazonian soils with similar characteristics.

  • Uptake of Cd, Pb, and Ni by Origanum syriacum produced in Lebanon 2019-08-06

    Abstract

    Trace metals are found naturally in soil. However, the increase in industrial and agricultural polluting activities has increased trace metal contamination and raised high concerns in the public health sector. The study was conducted on Origanum syriacum, one of the most consumed herbs in the Middle East, and was divided into three parts. (1) Pot experiment: to study the effect of Cd, Pb, or Ni levels in soil on their uptake by O. syriacum. (2) Field samples: collected from major agricultural regions in Lebanon to analyze Cd, Pb, and Ni concentrations in soil and leaves. (3) Sale outlets samples: to measure the levels of Cd, Pb, and Ni in O. syriacum tissues in the market. Results showed that there was a positive correlation between levels of Cd, Pb, and Ni in soil and those in O. syriacum tissues. None of the field samples contained Pb or Ni that exceeded the maximum allowable limits (MAL). Three samples collected from heavily poultry-manured soil contained Cd higher than the MAL. Samples collected from sale outlets did not exceed the MAL for Ni but two exceeded the MAL for Cd and one for Pb. Trace metal contamination is not a major concern in O. syriacum produced in Lebanon. Only one mixture sample from a sale outlet was higher in Pb than the MAL and three samples from heavily manured fields exceeded the MAL for Cd.